longer conical area
- heinzgries
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2018 4:52 pm
- Location: Heidelberg/germany
longer conical area
can I extend the conical area of an alto trombone by installing a longer conical leadpipe?
I have a B&S alto where the lines up out of tune. i think the cylindrical area is too long in relation to the conical area. Bb is extremly to low.
I have a B&S alto where the lines up out of tune. i think the cylindrical area is too long in relation to the conical area. Bb is extremly to low.
- Burgerbob
- Posts: 5136
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:10 pm
- Location: LA
- Contact:
Re: longer conical area
It's not uncommon for some German altos have leadpipes that are the length of the upper tube.
Aidan Ritchie, LA area player and teacher
- heinzgries
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2018 4:52 pm
- Location: Heidelberg/germany
Re: longer conical area
if i put the B&S slide section on my Bach 39 the tuning is much better. So i think the conical area in the tuning slide of the B&S alto is to short.
-
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2019 9:06 am
- Location: New Jersey
- Contact:
Re: longer conical area
Is it a current model B&S Alto? they are fairly well regarded, so I wouldn't think they would have intonation issues. Have you contacted them or someone familiar with trombone design?
David S. - daveyboy37 from TTF
Bach 39, LT36B, 42BOF & 42T, King 2103 / 3b, Kanstul 1570CR & 1588CR, Yamaha YBL-612 RII, YBL-822G & YBL-830, Sterling 1056GHS Euphonium,
Livingston Symphony Orchestra NJ - Trombone
Bach 39, LT36B, 42BOF & 42T, King 2103 / 3b, Kanstul 1570CR & 1588CR, Yamaha YBL-612 RII, YBL-822G & YBL-830, Sterling 1056GHS Euphonium,
Livingston Symphony Orchestra NJ - Trombone
- heinzgries
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2018 4:52 pm
- Location: Heidelberg/germany
Re: longer conical area
My B&S alto is from 1995. I can not find any alto on their current website, so i think it is not longer build.tbonesullivan wrote: ↑Fri Jul 10, 2020 8:25 pm Is it a current model B&S Alto? they are fairly well regarded, so I wouldn't think they would have intonation issues. Have you contacted them or someone familiar with trombone design?
Next week i will go to my favorit repairs man and ask him. Perhaps a new tuning slide will solve the problem.
We will see.
- harrisonreed
- Posts: 5238
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2018 12:18 pm
- Location: Fort Riley, Kansas
- Contact:
Re: longer conical area
I did it by cutting the tuning slides. Mine is a 36H, so I don't really care about 7th position
- heinzgries
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2018 4:52 pm
- Location: Heidelberg/germany
Re: longer conical area
Seems to be an easy solution. You have shortened the cylindrical area.harrisonreed wrote: ↑Sat Jul 11, 2020 2:12 am I did it by cutting the tuning slides. Mine is a 36H, so I don't really care about 7th position
But so, you must pull your slide a bit out to get the 1th position, right?
Is it so short, that the pitch is nearly in E ?
-
- Posts: 1447
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 10:52 am
Re: longer conical area
I can't figure out from your original post which pitch or pitches are out of tune. Please describe your pitch problems in words relative to alto clef. For example......the 1st position G at the top of the staff is sharp.
Brian D. Hinkley - Player, Teacher, Technician and Trombone Enthusiast
- harrisonreed
- Posts: 5238
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2018 12:18 pm
- Location: Fort Riley, Kansas
- Contact:
Re: longer conical area
No, it's not nearly that sharp, but I do usually play long on the slide anyways. This puts Db at the bell.heinzgries wrote: ↑Sat Jul 11, 2020 4:49 amSeems to be an easy solution. You have shortened the cylindrical area.harrisonreed wrote: ↑Sat Jul 11, 2020 2:12 am I did it by cutting the tuning slides. Mine is a 36H, so I don't really care about 7th position
But so, you must pull your slide a bit out to get the 1th position, right?
Is it so short, that the pitch is nearly in E ?
- heinzgries
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2018 4:52 pm
- Location: Heidelberg/germany
Re: longer conical area
I try to do this with the pic below. Hope it helps.Crazy4Tbone86 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 11, 2020 8:29 am I can't figure out from your original post which pitch or pitches are out of tune. Please describe your pitch problems in words relative to alto clef. For example......the 1st position G at the top of the staff is sharp.
- BGuttman
- Posts: 6373
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2018 7:19 am
- Location: Cow Hampshire
Re: longer conical area
Heinz, this looks like the very reason Harrison had his tuning slide shortened. If you were to cut around 6 mm from the slide you may find that you can play in tune if you put 1st position out around 3 mm from the bumper.
Alternatively, it could be that there is a mismatch between your mouthpiece and the instrument. I found on my Conn 36H that the Conn 7C it came with had better consistency across the partials than anything else, including a Bach 7C. But I prefer the sound I get with my old Bach 4C so I humor the intonation issues.
Alternatively, it could be that there is a mismatch between your mouthpiece and the instrument. I found on my Conn 36H that the Conn 7C it came with had better consistency across the partials than anything else, including a Bach 7C. But I prefer the sound I get with my old Bach 4C so I humor the intonation issues.
Bruce Guttman
Merrimack Valley Philharmonic Orchestra
"Almost Professional"
Merrimack Valley Philharmonic Orchestra
"Almost Professional"
-
- Posts: 1447
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 10:52 am
Re: longer conical area
Yes, your horn is completely normal. It’s just that it is a little flat. As Bruce said......just cut a little off your tuning slide. I guess that is what your original question was.....I just couldn’t figure out what you meant by “cylindrical area.”
Brian D. Hinkley - Player, Teacher, Technician and Trombone Enthusiast
- Doug Elliott
- Posts: 3426
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2018 10:12 pm
- Location: Maryand
Re: longer conical area
Saying that one partial is "in tune" and everything else is flat seems like an odd way of looking at it.
The whole horn is flat and one note is sharp.
First I would look at shortening the mouthpiece by a good bit. It may very well need a different style of backbore. Make a major correction and all of the harmonics will probably shift, not all the same way, then you'll have a different and maybe better perspective.
I would at least try it from the mouthpiece/leadpipe end before cutting the horn.
One more random thought - people laugh at AcoustiCoils, which are rolled-up plastic strips to be inserted in the tuning slide leg or other places (seems like a ridiculous idea) but that is a way to change the effective taper in an area like a tuning slide and try it in different places to see if it corrects anything.
The whole horn is flat and one note is sharp.
First I would look at shortening the mouthpiece by a good bit. It may very well need a different style of backbore. Make a major correction and all of the harmonics will probably shift, not all the same way, then you'll have a different and maybe better perspective.
I would at least try it from the mouthpiece/leadpipe end before cutting the horn.
One more random thought - people laugh at AcoustiCoils, which are rolled-up plastic strips to be inserted in the tuning slide leg or other places (seems like a ridiculous idea) but that is a way to change the effective taper in an area like a tuning slide and try it in different places to see if it corrects anything.
"I know a thing or two because I've seen a thing or two."
- heinzgries
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2018 4:52 pm
- Location: Heidelberg/germany
Re: longer conical area
I use a Doug Elliot MT 99 C+ with a D alto S shank or a Klier 5 G with smaller shank. Both goes 1.06 inch into the leadpipe.BGuttman wrote: ↑Sun Jul 12, 2020 6:19 am Alternatively, it could be that there is a mismatch between your mouthpiece and the instrument. I found on my Conn 36H that the Conn 7C it came with had better consistency across the partials than anything else, including a Bach 7C. But I prefer the sound I get with my old Bach 4C so I humor the intonation issues.
- heinzgries
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2018 4:52 pm
- Location: Heidelberg/germany
Re: longer conical area
Hello Doug,Doug Elliott wrote: ↑Sun Jul 12, 2020 10:58 am One more random thought - people laugh at AcoustiCoils, which are rolled-up plastic strips to be inserted in the tuning slide leg or other places (seems like a ridiculous idea) but that is a way to change the effective taper in an area like a tuning slide and try it in different places to see if it corrects anything.
do you mean like this?
- BGuttman
- Posts: 6373
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2018 7:19 am
- Location: Cow Hampshire
Re: longer conical area
It's a special poduct intended to be placed in the bow of the tuning slide. I couldn't get a picture of it from the site, sorry. Note that any old plastic strip will NOT be the same.
Bruce Guttman
Merrimack Valley Philharmonic Orchestra
"Almost Professional"
Merrimack Valley Philharmonic Orchestra
"Almost Professional"
- heinzgries
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2018 4:52 pm
- Location: Heidelberg/germany
Re: longer conical area
Thanks Bruce,
does a thin brass tube do the same job? I have different sizes.
I think one of the diameters will fit.
- Doug Elliott
- Posts: 3426
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2018 10:12 pm
- Location: Maryand
Re: longer conical area
Try it in different places. Make a wire hook so you can pull it back out. I think the larger side would be more likely to have an effect.
I can make you a shorter shank to try. I'll be making shanks in a few days.
I can make you a shorter shank to try. I'll be making shanks in a few days.
"I know a thing or two because I've seen a thing or two."
- heinzgries
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2018 4:52 pm
- Location: Heidelberg/germany
Re: longer conical area
I already play an alto S shank from you. It goes deep enough into the leadpipe (1.06 inch)Doug Elliott wrote: ↑Sun Jul 12, 2020 2:20 pm Try it in different places. Make a wire hook so you can pull it back out. I think the larger side would be more likely to have an effect.
I can make you a shorter shank to try. I'll be making shanks in a few days.
- Doug Elliott
- Posts: 3426
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2018 10:12 pm
- Location: Maryand
Re: longer conical area
But you're trying to correct a problem. It's relatively easy for me to make special shanks - I would try about 10mm shorter, and make it go into the leadpipe the same distance.heinzgries wrote: ↑Sun Jul 12, 2020 3:09 pmI already play an alto S shank from you. It goes deep enough into the leadpipe (1.06 inch)Doug Elliott wrote: ↑Sun Jul 12, 2020 2:20 pm I can make you a shorter shank to try. I'll be making shanks in a few days.
"I know a thing or two because I've seen a thing or two."
- harrisonreed
- Posts: 5238
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2018 12:18 pm
- Location: Fort Riley, Kansas
- Contact:
Re: longer conical area
Are you already playing with he tuning slide pushed in all the way? If not, you should start doing that. Or, at the very least, time your horn so that Db is in tune with the edge of the bell. Then your note will no longer be flat across the board.heinzgries wrote: ↑Sun Jul 12, 2020 3:12 amI try to do this with the pic below. Hope it helps.Crazy4Tbone86 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 11, 2020 8:29 am I can't figure out from your original post which pitch or pitches are out of tune. Please describe your pitch problems in words relative to alto clef. For example......the 1st position G at the top of the staff is sharp.
- heinzgries
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2018 4:52 pm
- Location: Heidelberg/germany
Re: longer conical area
Today I tested the other extremely. 2 mouthpieces by Werner Chr. Schmidt. Once the F.A.H. 1 and the Ed Kruspe 3. both are very long (3.45 inches). They both only fit .866 inches into the leadpipe of the B&S alto. It's curious, but the result was almost perfect.
Btw thanks for all your information and helpfull response.
https://www.schmidt-brass.de/englisch/m ... ombone.htm
Btw thanks for all your information and helpfull response.
https://www.schmidt-brass.de/englisch/m ... ombone.htm
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2018 6:06 pm
Re: longer conical area
Good afternoon,
Doug's suggestion of the shorter shank should really be the first option to try, especially now that you've found two other mouthpieces that play in tune. I'm not familiar with those two, but the original 2 you mentioned (DE99 & 5C) may just be too large for your alto and/or playing to cope with in general. If the horn was originally designed for a very small/shallow mouthpiece, the cup size of those two may be more the problem.
But, listen to Doug.
Simon
Doug's suggestion of the shorter shank should really be the first option to try, especially now that you've found two other mouthpieces that play in tune. I'm not familiar with those two, but the original 2 you mentioned (DE99 & 5C) may just be too large for your alto and/or playing to cope with in general. If the horn was originally designed for a very small/shallow mouthpiece, the cup size of those two may be more the problem.
But, listen to Doug.
Simon
- Doug Elliott
- Posts: 3426
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2018 10:12 pm
- Location: Maryand
Re: longer conical area
Well, he said the two longer mouthpieces corrected it. It's not unusual to see the opposite effect from what you'd expect - maybe they're small with shallow cups and small throat & backbore, so the overall volume is less.
With a larger rim size it would need a shallower cup and shorter shank. Both ways work.
With a larger rim size it would need a shallower cup and shorter shank. Both ways work.
"I know a thing or two because I've seen a thing or two."