Schilke 59 /58 question

Post Reply
User avatar
dukesboneman
Posts: 730
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2018 4:40 pm
Location: Sarasota, Florida
Contact:

Schilke 59 /58 question

Post by dukesboneman »

Hey all,
Are the Schilke 58 & 59 Bass Trombone mouthpieces the same cup depth and throat? Just that the 59 is a little bigger or are there other differences?
Thanks
WGWTR180
Posts: 1466
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2019 2:32 pm

Re: Schilke 59 /58 question

Post by WGWTR180 »

Completely different.
marccromme
Posts: 358
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2018 7:03 am
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Contact:

Re: Schilke 59 /58 question

Post by marccromme »

And if you want a better Schilke in the 59 size, try a Laskey 85MD
User avatar
dukesboneman
Posts: 730
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2018 4:40 pm
Location: Sarasota, Florida
Contact:

Re: Schilke 59 /58 question

Post by dukesboneman »

I phoned Schilke and asked the same question.
Same back bore
59 has a slightly deeper cup
Kbiggs
Posts: 1296
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 11:46 am
Location: Vancouver WA

Re: Schilke 59 /58 question

Post by Kbiggs »

You might also try Karl Hammond’s 19BL and 20BL. He used to work for Schilke and, IIRC, helped develop their Symphony line of tenor and bass mpcs.
Kenneth Biggs
I have known a great many troubles, but most of them have never happened.
—Mark Twain (attributed)
User avatar
Mv2541
Posts: 557
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2018 10:07 am
Location: New Jersey

Re: Schilke 59 /58 question

Post by Mv2541 »

Kbiggs wrote: Fri Feb 28, 2020 7:23 am You might also try Karl Hammond’s 19BL and 20BL. He used to work for Schilke and, IIRC, helped develop their Symphony line of tenor and bass mpcs.
Just saying the throats on the Hammonds are much larger than the Schilkes. Even the larger 59 has about a .300 throat compared to the .316 on the Hammonds.
Software Developer/Educator
JP Rath 236 - XT L101 C+/AS
Bach LT16M - XT L101 C+/D3
Bach 36BO - XT L101 E/E4
Edwards T396 - XT L101 F+/G8
Courtois 502 - LB L114 L/L8
User avatar
Burgerbob
Posts: 5136
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:10 pm
Location: LA
Contact:

Re: Schilke 59 /58 question

Post by Burgerbob »

dukesboneman wrote: Fri Feb 28, 2020 5:43 am I phoned Schilke and asked the same question.
Same back bore
59 has a slightly deeper cup
Yup, so completely different :)
Aidan Ritchie, LA area player and teacher
Posaunus
Posts: 3985
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:54 pm
Location: California

Re: Schilke 59 /58 question

Post by Posaunus »

Burgerbob wrote: Fri Feb 28, 2020 1:56 pm
dukesboneman wrote: Fri Feb 28, 2020 5:43 am Same back bore
59 has a slightly deeper cup
Yup, so completely different :)
59 cup is larger diameter, as well as deeper, than 58. Both have very large throats.

My measurements:
Model ||||| Cup I.D. (mm/in.) ||| Throat (mm/in.)
Schilke 58 |||27.20 / 1.070" |||||| 7.67 / 0.302"
Schilke 59 |||27.85 / 1.096" | ||||| 7.67 / 0.302"
User avatar
Burgerbob
Posts: 5136
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:10 pm
Location: LA
Contact:

Re: Schilke 59 /58 question

Post by Burgerbob »

Posaunus wrote: Fri Feb 28, 2020 3:05 pm
Burgerbob wrote: Fri Feb 28, 2020 1:56 pm

Yup, so completely different :)
59 cup is larger diameter, as well as deeper, than 58. Both have very large throats.

My measurements:
Model ||||| Cup I.D. (mm/in.) ||| Throat (mm/in.)
Schilke 58 |||27.20 / 1.070" |||||| 7.67 / 0.302"
Schilke 59 |||27.85 / 1.096" | ||||| 7.67 / 0.302"
I'm not sure I would quantify .302 as very large.
Aidan Ritchie, LA area player and teacher
Posaunus
Posts: 3985
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:54 pm
Location: California

Re: Schilke 59 /58 question

Post by Posaunus »

Burgerbob wrote: Fri Feb 28, 2020 3:33 pm
Posaunus wrote: Fri Feb 28, 2020 3:05 pm
59 cup is larger diameter, as well as deeper, than 58. Both have very large throats.

My measurements:
Model ||||| Cup I.D. (mm/in.) ||| Throat (mm/in.)
Schilke 58 |||27.20 / 1.070" |||||| 7.67 / 0.302"
Schilke 59 |||27.85 / 1.096" | ||||| 7.67 / 0.302"
I'm not sure I would quantify .302 as very large.
To me, 0.302" is a pretty big throat. Plenty large for me. Bach 1¼G, 1½G, 2G, etc. have specified throats of a mere 0.276." Bach 1G throat is listed at 0.319" - too large for me, but I'm not a full-time bass trombonist.

However, I understand that in the times of the bass trombone arms race, larger is better. ;)
User avatar
Burgerbob
Posts: 5136
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:10 pm
Location: LA
Contact:

Re: Schilke 59 /58 question

Post by Burgerbob »

Posaunus wrote: Fri Feb 28, 2020 4:21 pm
Burgerbob wrote: Fri Feb 28, 2020 3:33 pm

I'm not sure I would quantify .302 as very large.
To me, 0.302" is a pretty big throat. Plenty large for me. Bach 1¼G, 1½G, 2G, etc. have specified throats of a mere 0.276." Bach 1G throat is listed at 0.319" - too large for me, but I'm not a full-time bass trombonist.

However, I understand that in the times of the bass trombone arms race, larger is better. ;)
Of course, that's not true. But as mentioned above, most modern mouthpieces have something like a .312, which is not as large as it gets. .300 is a middle ground.
Aidan Ritchie, LA area player and teacher
FullPedalTrombonist
Posts: 152
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 2:28 pm

Re: Schilke 59 /58 question

Post by FullPedalTrombonist »

As far as they play I notice quite a bit of difference. More than switching rims on the same DE mouthpiece. So to me that means there’s some difference because of the cup volume or shape, and specifically the cup if Schilke says the backbore is the same shape.

58: more dense and maybe easier to color.

59: more clarity of tone, but less crisp beginnings of articulations.

Pretty general observations across one long shank and one short shank 58, and one long shank 59, a couple short shank 59’s, and one Symphony 5.9 of some flavor.

EDIT: not a 5.9, but a 59 that had a shallower cup. I asked my old classmate what it was and if he still had it. I just remember it having the same knurling as my *5.3
Last edited by FullPedalTrombonist on Sun Mar 01, 2020 6:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
jimtheob
Posts: 35
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2018 3:18 pm
Location: Weaverville, NC
Contact:

Re: Schilke 59 /58 question

Post by jimtheob »

Just to throw a bit into the mix, I just bought a Getzen 1062 bass and I was having trouble with pedals. In desperation I bought a used Bach 1G and my pedals became just what I wanted and I can slot well into upper register. Just goes to show that everyone is different. Only problem it is a bit tiring to play on the immense cup for long periods. Have to work on my stamina.
User avatar
dukesboneman
Posts: 730
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2018 4:40 pm
Location: Sarasota, Florida
Contact:

Re: Schilke 59 /58 question

Post by dukesboneman »

I think I`ll see if I can get a hold of a 58
User avatar
dukesboneman
Posts: 730
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2018 4:40 pm
Location: Sarasota, Florida
Contact:

Re: Schilke 59 /58 question

Post by dukesboneman »

I picked up a 58 and so far I`m really liking it.
The sound is a little more compact, but sooooo much easier to focus and attack
when playing above tuning Bb. For me just more even top to bottom
Post Reply

Return to “Mouthpieces”