Schilke 51 vs. Hammond 12ML
-
Bach5G
- Posts: 2531
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 6:10 pm
Schilke 51 vs. Hammond 12ML
Has anyone directly compared these two mouthpieces? Thoughts?
-
Burgerbob
- Posts: 5163
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:10 pm
- Location: LA
- Contact:
Re: Schilke 51 vs. Hammond 12ML
51 is deeper by a bit. The Hammond has a more open throat. Personally, I find the Hammond to be a little shallow and bright in that depth, and the 51 is a very good mouthpiece by itself.
The closest Hammond to the 51 (IMO) would be a custom 12MXL.
The closest Hammond to the 51 (IMO) would be a custom 12MXL.
Aidan Ritchie, LA area player and teacher
-
Crazytrombonist505
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2018 12:25 pm
- Location: Clinton, SC
Re: Schilke 51 vs. Hammond 12ML
I’ve tried both the Schilke and the Hammond. I agree with burgerbob about the Schilke being deeper than the Hammond. I didn’t like the Hammond (probably because it was too shallow), but the Schilke is my main tenor mouthpiece. For comparison, The Schilke is closer to a 5G mouthpiece IMO.
-
imsevimse
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2018 10:43 am
- Location: Sweden
Re: Schilke 51 vs. Hammond 12ML
For some reason the 12M (which is more shallow) and the 12MXL (which is deeper) gives a fuller sound than the 12ML on my .525 horns. I have no clue why, but I use a large shank 12ML and 12MXL on my .547 horns and there I think both works. I haven't tried a Schilke 51.
/Tom
/Tom