Too big vs. too small?

Post Reply
User avatar
Fruitysloth
Posts: 333
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 10:28 pm

Too big vs. too small?

Post by Fruitysloth »

Hey all,

I'm primarily a tenor player, but have been called to double on bass more frequently than I'm used to. I'm currently going back and forth between a Stork 1.5 and a Marcinkiewicz 1.5G. With both of these mouthpieces, I'm having an easy time accessing my high register (G third line above bass clef and up), but popping some of the lower notes, D - C below the staff, are more of a challenge to pin, and I have to shift considerably to hit the pedals. I'm trying out a Schilke 60, which is WAY too big, but I don't have to shift at all for pedals. Thoughts? Other than practice, which I'm definitely trying to do more of in light of having to double as much as I have recently. Thanks in advance!
Trombone Forum User "Jhungate96"
User avatar
BGuttman
Posts: 6394
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2018 7:19 am
Location: Cow Hampshire

Re: Too big vs. too small?

Post by BGuttman »

I found the Schilke 60 (and Bach 1G) too big and uncomfortable. I used a 1 1/4G for a while, then a Schilke 59, Warburton 3, and then I met Doug Elliott. He put me on a LB 114 L with an L8 shank. It was the depth of the 1 G but a smaller rim. Worked great. I think the Yamaha Yeo is also like this. Check out the Yeo, or talk to Doug.
Bruce Guttman
Merrimack Valley Philharmonic Orchestra
"Almost Professional"
Pezza
Posts: 165
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2021 6:30 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Too big vs. too small?

Post by Pezza »

1.5G is a pretty standard bass bone mouthpiece.
I use a wedge 1.5G on bass. My 3G euph also works on bass.
I went the "bigger is better" route obout 20 years ago, but have since scaled back.
Am I a trombone player who plays euphonium, or a euphonium player who plays trombone? :idk:
User avatar
Burgerbob
Posts: 5163
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:10 pm
Location: LA
Contact:

Re: Too big vs. too small?

Post by Burgerbob »

Practice is going to be necessary even with exactly the right piece. With that in mind, I'd recommend using the 1.5s for a bit longer but sinking a bit more into that bass concept. It's pretty easy to play them in a small way and have the horn respond like a tenor, which is not what you want.
Aidan Ritchie, LA area player and teacher
RustBeltBass
Posts: 329
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2018 4:56 pm

Re: Too big vs. too small?

Post by RustBeltBass »

Plenty of choices in between 1.5 and Schilke 60 style mouthpieces.

However, 1.5 sized mouthpieces are popular with doublers and more important is a routine that strengthens your bass skills, so maybe try that first before experimenting with equipment. What materials are you currently using when practicing on bass ?
hyperbolica
Posts: 3205
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 7:31 am

Re: Too big vs. too small?

Post by hyperbolica »

You can split the difference. I play 1 1/4 size stuff on bass. DE LB112K and Ferguson L. Yamaha 60, Schilke 59, Bach 1 1/4G also fit in that slot.
User avatar
spencercarran
Posts: 645
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2020 1:02 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: Too big vs. too small?

Post by spencercarran »

Lots in between, and the Marc 1.5 is sort of an odd beast even among ~1.5-sized pieces.
User avatar
Matt K
Verified
Posts: 4314
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2018 10:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Too big vs. too small?

Post by Matt K »

There's a big jump between 1.5G (1.08") and Schilke 59 / Bach 1.25G (1.12") and Schilke 60 (1.14"). That's like going from a 6.5AL (1.0") to a ~3G (1.04") or a 2G (1.06")... or going from a 12C (.96") to a 6.5AL or 4G (1.02").

I feel like the 1.10" size is underrated, and does a good job splitting the difference. As a doubler, I'm moving more towards the smaller end, but if I'm in good shape on that, I can switch over to 1.10" very easily if I want a little more of the low end.

I don't know what kind of depth you're talking about, but I find that paradoxically that somewhat shallower cups give a better low range. A lot of times I want something that sounds loud, maybe with a little edge. I'd been using an Elliott "L" for awhile, but have been switching to something shallower for most playing unless, again, I really want to focus on low range at the cost of high range and then I can pop the deeper cup in.
musicofnote
Posts: 269
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2022 11:31 am

Re: Too big vs. too small?

Post by musicofnote »

content deleted by author
Last edited by musicofnote on Sun Jun 30, 2024 1:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
Kbiggs
Posts: 1306
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 11:46 am
Location: Vancouver WA

Re: Too big vs. too small?

Post by Kbiggs »

In performance, most people shift for the pedal notes. Even Phil Teele said that his “no shift” rule was primarily for the practice room. While it’s ideal to not shift at all, you do what needs to be done in performance.

Do you like the sound, flexibility, basic articulation, feel, etc. of either of your 1.5G mpcs? What don’t you like about them? Do you need pedal notes for the kind of bass doubling you will do? Is it something you can work on?

Several folks have already mentioned that there are plenty of mpc rim sizes between your standard 1.5G (whatever that is) and a Schilke 60. It sounds like you would benefit from guidance, and a good, objective set of eyes and ears to hear and watch you play. Doug?
Kenneth Biggs
I have known a great many troubles, but most of them have never happened.
—Mark Twain (attributed)
Bach5G
Posts: 2531
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 6:10 pm

Re: Too big vs. too small?

Post by Bach5G »

It seems to me that Phil said to do whatever you have to on the gig.
Post Reply

Return to “Mouthpieces”