Posaunus wrote: ↑Thu Oct 13, 2022 11:48 am
So is the message here that Covid isn't real; that long Covid is a myth; that some people aren't really getting sick from this devious virus; that not very many folks are actually dying from the consequences, complications, and sequelae of Covid; that we shouldn't be taking any precautions like wearing masks or getting vaccinated? I'm confused.
No, the message here is that you have to pay attention to the source of statistics. People of any persuasion can use them to forward any agenda.
Also, it's possible for an answer to be complicated, but that's another thing that has been lost in the last couple of decades. A true answer to any technical question is almost always more complex than black or white.
I totally believe that government agencies may be trying to do the right thing (show that death can have multiple contributing factors), but the result is that some people are using the statistics to increase the alarm that more people are dying from a specific cause. Plus, how the reported results are presented or quoted can be problematic even if the original data is perfect.
In case there's any confusion, I'm calling both sides liars and cheats. We should approach all statistics with skepticism. Unless you were there for the whole process and know the situation intimately, you don't really have any way of being positive that the results are being biased by this story or that story or interpreted with a particular view in mind. You're not going to prove anything with statistics, just show another potentially prejudiced data set.
Statistics generally lack context. There is a set of extenuating circumstances behind every hashmark on a survey. I can't attest to the "truth" behind any set of statistics, all I know is my own experience. Some people mock personal stories, but these are the context that you never see with numbers. Any set of data can be used to foist lies on the gullible in the name of unquestionable truth.
Personally, I have taken all shots and boosters, and I avoid groups of people. Unless it's music related, then I take my chances. I haven't had covid (yet) and I want to avoid it, although I know many people who have had it and even died from it (early on). I have friends that are way more careful than I am, but also some friends who are deniers. I talked to a guy who hasn't been out to eat in over 2 years. I think that's crazy. You'd go insane by isolating that much. But then I work at home and only go out for an occasional date night, rehearsals/gigs, or shopping. And I never wear a mask unless I go into a medical facility that requires it. I don't know what label you want to pin on that, but to me, it's a balanced response. Being sensible and avoiding unnecessary risk when I can, but also not allowing paranoia to make me crazy and keep me from living my life. My "not eating out" friend has several health issues that I don't have, and covid might well be a death sentence for him. My anti-vax friend has had the illness, luckily a mild case. Both of their decisions make sense from their point of view, but I don't agree with either.
Most people I know aren't at either extreme. They're in the middle. Which is where I am. I think people at both ends are crazy. So far I'm not dead from any combination of factors, and I'm not crazy from isolation. Just be careful whose BS you listen to. Make up your own mind. And again incase it isn't clear, I believe @officermayo's story, and I think it backs up what I'm saying - don't believe every set of numbers being claimed as irrefutable proof of anything.