robcat2075 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 07, 2022 9:14 pm
BGuttman wrote: ↑Fri Oct 07, 2022 3:54 pm
Just imagine how frustrating it was to the Philharmonic players in 1962. They had been based in Carnegie Hall, which had superb acoustics, and then were subjected to this.
I'd be thinking, "Damn. The people who decided on this hall are the same ones who run this orchestra. We're doomed."
If the hall had been built as it was supposed to be, it would have been a good hall. There is another hall in NYC at Queens College, Colden Auditorium, that was designed by the same acoustic team as Philharmonic Hall. It was built a couple of years before Lincoln Center; supposedly it was used as a test case for Philharmonic Hall, and it has terrific acoustics. So everyone had good reason to believe Philharmonic Hall was going to be as good.
One of my teachers was a first call freelance horn player back in the day: he played at Carnegie hall often and told me that it wasn’t that much fun to play there as it seemed. As much as the acoustics were wonderful, at the time, everything else about the hall was not: it wasn’t air conditioned, there was almost no room or facilities backstage, it was impossible to record in it because the subway ran under it and recording would pick up the rumble, and there was little or no parking in the area: at that time, more people were moving to the suburbs and would drive into work. Also, Juilliard was on 122 street, so it was a long trip to get up there to teach. So the move to Lincoln Center made sense.
I know that before Geffen came forward with the money, there was talk of the philharmonic moving back to Carnegie Hall, which now has much better backstage facilities and air conditioning after its renovation, but the lack of parking and proximity to Juilliard were still major sticking points with the musicians. At the end of the day, quality of life and convenience are also something to consider.